|
|
|
Standards of Quality |
|
¡@ |
|
Relying on ongoing
research and rigorous procedures of test development and
administration, the GEPT has maintained its high quality, validity,
and reliability. The GEPT conforms to widely accepted codes of
practice in language assessment. A test review* published in "Language Testing"
suggests that the GEPT is communicatively oriented and highly
reliable. |
| ¡@ |
| *Carsten Roever and Yi-Ching Pan,
"GEPT: General English Proficiency Test." Language Testing, 2008, 25 (3), pp. 403-418. |
| ¡@ |
| ¡@ |
|

The research and development team is
responsible for writing test items, compiling test forms, and
conducting research on test development and validation. The LTTC
also employs domestic and international experts as consultants,
research committee members, testing committee members, item
reviewers, and item writers. In order to further enhance the quality
of the GEPT, the LTTC invited four renowned scholars in the field of
language testing, Prof. Lyle F. Bachman (University of California,
Los Angeles, U.S.), Prof. Antony Kunnan (California State
University, Los Angeles, U.S.), Prof. Tim McNamara (University of
Melbourne, Australia), Prof. Cyril J. Weir (University of
Bedfordshire, UK), and Pro. Charles Alderson (Lancaster University,
U.K.) to advise the GEPT research and development team in the
capacity of consultants. |
|
¡@ |
| |
|

Research papers and
reports on the GEPT have been published in testing-related books,
professional journals, and on the
LTTC website.
Since the GEPT was launched in 2000, research into validation,
reliability, absence of bias, access and accommodations,
administration and security, and social consequences has been
conducted. |
| ¡@ |
| ¡@ |
|
Perspectives on the GEPT |
|
¡@ |
|
Read perspectives of
government officials, deans of various colleges at National Taiwan
University, and noted scholars in the field of language assessment
and teaching. |
¡@ |