|
|
|
GEPTˇVCEFR Alignment |
|
ˇ@ |
|
Results of
qualitative and quantitative analyses show that the Elementary,
Intermediate, High-Intermediate,
and Advanced levels of the GEPT correspond to the Common
European Framework of Reference (CEFR)
A2, B1, B2, and C1 levels, respectively (please see the table
below).
The MOE adopted the CEFR in 2005 and required all
major tests in Taiwan to be mapped onto the CEFR for
test-users' reference. The LTTC officially registered with the
Council of Europe to participate in their Project
for Piloting the Manual for Relating Language Examinations to
the CEFR in July 2005. Upon completion of
the study, the results were submitted to the Council of Europe
in September 2006 to provide feedback and
suggestions for revisions to the Manual.
According to the
results of the specification procedure, the GEPT conforms to a
widely accepted code of
practice, involving development, item compiling, and rating
processes. To follow up on the piloting study, the
LTTC conducted the LTTC GEPT-CEFR Alignment Project in 2007. A
paper on the project was presented
at the Fourth EALTA Conference and was published in Studies in
Language Testing.1 A further study
investigating the alignment between the GEPT and the CEFR was
completed in 20112 and a research study
on the alignment between the GEPT and IELTS was completed in 20133.
|
| ˇ@ |
|
GEPT
|
CEFR |
IELTS |
TOEFL iBT |
|
Advanced |
Second Stage
(speaking and writing) |
C1 |
7.5 |
110 |
First stage
(listening and reading) |
7.0 |
100 |
|
High-Intermediate |
Second stage
(speaking and writing) |
B2 |
6.5 |
92 |
First stage
(listening and reading) |
6.0 |
79 |
|
Intermediate |
Second stage
(speaking and writing) |
B1 |
5.5 |
Below 79 |
First stage
(listening and reading) |
5.0 |
|
| ˇ@ |
|
Notes:
• The chart above is an
estimate of the concordance between GEPT, IELTS, and TOEFL
iBT. It may serve as a
reference for educational
institutions in evaluating the English language proficiency of
their prospective
students. However, it should be
used with caution, as the tests in the concordance table are
designed for
different purposes and
populations, and they may assess language proficiency
differently.
• The IELTS
and CEFR alignment listed above is based on ˇ§Figure 1: The
mapping of the IELTS scale to the
Common
European Framework,ˇ¨ retrieved from the IELTS website, and on
test result explanations retrieved
from
the British
Council website.
• The
IELTS and the TOEFL iBT score concordance listed above is based
on a survey of entry requirements for
academic
programs at universities in the U.S., U.K., and Australia.
ˇ@ |
| 1Wu, J. R. W., & Wu,
R. Y. F. (2010). Relating the GEPT reading comprehension tests
to the CEFR. Studies in
Language Testing, 33,
204-224. |
2Wu, R. Y. F. (2011). Establishing the validity of
the General English Proficiency Test reading component
through
a critical evaluation on alignment with the Common European
Framework of Reference. Unpublished
doctoral thesis, University of
Bedfordshire. |
3Weir, C., Chan, S. H., & Nakatsuhara, F. (2013). Examining the criterion-related validity of the GEPT advanced
reading and writing tests: Comparing GEPT with IELTS and real-life academic performance. The complete report
is accessible at
http://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/lttc-gept-grants/RReport/RG01.pdf. |
ˇ@ |